reignite: don't take tyy. (Default)
[ demon-like judge of fire. ] ([personal profile] reignite) wrote2023-02-05 03:46 pm
astika: (separation-7-1)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
[he closes his eyes for a moment, as though listening to the sounds, before opening them and glancing at uriel.]

Ah, right. You would've had it for two weeks, after your arrival.
astika: (twot-5-1)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
[he hums.]

Any place loses its novelty quickly enough.
astika: (threat-3-1)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
[yeah, everything gets dull pretty quickly when you've seen it all.]

Such as?
astika: (separation-7-1)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
[NO PINGPONG]

... Well, they're not really the kind of things deities would experience unless they were observing or mingling among humans.

I guess that'd be all the more so for you, considering the restrictions Eden seemed to have.
astika: (devastation-4-2)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
[...]

How do timelines work where you're from? You spoke of a 999th—do timelines only occur one after the other, then?
astika: (yjam-26-5)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
... It's not too odd. Traveling through timelines is possible in my universe, albeit rarely done—you'd need the backing of one of the few beings capable of "Time".

Though if someone goes back and alters history enough to create a branching route, it typically leads to the death of everything in the path that was no longer chosen.
astika: (devastation-6-2)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-20 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
The other gods just thought I was talking bullshit when I attributed things to Time, so it's definitely not something that most people think about a lot.

[sometimes you get dismissed as a silly conspiracy theorist...... but you're RIGHT.]

Makes sense, I guess. The primary issue in my world is that when a timeline only becomes a "possibility that could have happened", it's often discarded by the Primeval Gods and left without the energy it needs to sustain itself.
astika: (yjam-26-5)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-21 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Mm. Well, in their case, it's less about being preoccupied with the present, and more as you saw in my memory—Visnu believes only in reaching for what he considers to be the single "best" future for the world.

And because the other gods naively believe Visnu's insight and judgment to be infallible, they all work towards that future.

[but for chandra, who would almost always choose to sacrifice the minority for the majority, letting so many worlds die just for the one is unacceptable to him.]
astika: (tmor-8-2)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-22 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
It's impossible to protect everything, so it only makes sense to act towards what will preserve the greatest number of lives in the long run.

[said with the confidence of someone who doesn't waver in this belief, no matter how callous it may be or how much others criticize him.]

If leaving one universe to die would save a thousand others, then I wouldn't have an issue. [kill a million to save ten million down the line, etc.] But that's why I disagree with the reverse. Even if Visnu is correct and his insight brings about the most ideal future for the chosen universe, I can't see that it would ultimately preserve significantly more lives than all the destroyed junctions it's built upon.

[he scowls.]

Not to mention that "the best future" isn't even guaranteed to happen. If anything, at this point it's far more likely not to, in which case the price paid will be in vain.
astika: (devastation-6-2)

[personal profile] astika 2023-03-27 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
[chandra would be a little surprised if uriel could readily agree to sacrificing one universe for the many—it seems a bit too ruthless for her, as easy as that answer comes to him.]

The gods' duty is to do whatever will preserve the universe for the longest, no matter who it means harming or defying.

[some gods might disagree on the nuances of that, but ultimately, chandra stands by that.]